Blog writing = bad academia
Of course, this isnââ¬â¢t strictly true. Any blog really just reflects the writing style of whoever it is typing away on the internet, but for me, keeping a blog has done horrible things to my academic writing.
For one thing, Iââ¬â¢m naturally an informal writer. I get by because my grammarââ¬â¢s usually correct and people mistake ââ¬Åbad humorââ¬Â for ââ¬Åvoice.ââ¬Â However you slice it, keeping a blog lets me write, edit, and publish whatever the hell I please, whenever I please, and at whatever length I choose to write. The only requirement is that Iââ¬â¢m happy enough with what Iââ¬â¢ve written down for other people to read it.
In academic terms, this is a nightmare. My sources are usually other blogs, and a bibliography is one of those things other people do. But most importantly, writing a good blog (even one that very few people read) is about clarity and entertainment. Good academic writing should involve their antonyms.
Such is the state of things as Iââ¬â¢m attempting to write a three thousand word essay on film noir. But all I can come up with is fifteen different ways to pack the big punches into a three hundred word blog post. Incidentally, everyone and their dogs would probably rather read the blog post, especially if I managed to put all the important thought into it, or at least imply important thought. But that wouldnââ¬â¢t be academic writing, would it?